The comprehensive gazetteer and bibliography of the medieval castles, fortifications and palaces of England, Wales, the Islands.
The listings
Other Info
Print Page 
Next Record 
Previous Record 
Back to list 

Maiden Castle Motte, Old Durham

In the civil parish of Durham.
In the historic county of Durham.
Modern Authority of Durham.
1974 county of County Durham.
Medieval County of County Palatinate of Durham.

OS Map Grid Reference: NZ285418
Latitude 54.77035° Longitude -1.55851°

Maiden Castle Motte, Old Durham has been described as a Timber Castle but is rejected as such.

There are no visible remains.


Motte and bailey entirely destroyed 1800-60. Was drawn in 1785 and appeared to be typical Motte and Bailey measuring 146m by 155m with a surrounding ditch 11m wide. (Jackson)

OLD DURHAM. In 1785 John Cade wrote of a work here which he called Maiden Castle, and quoted Stukeley's description; but the latter appears to relate to the early promontory camp on the opposite side of the Wear. It must be admitted that Stukeley is obscure, and apparently confuses east with west. The point of interest to us is that Cade's paper is accompanied by an engraving of the earthwork showing it to have been distinctly of the mount and court type. We cannot learn that anything is now left to record. (VCH)

I saw a camp, called Maiden-castle, which I judge to be theirs: it is almost incompassed too by a rivulet falling into the river from the east: it is of an oblong form, 500 foot long, very steep on three sides; the neck is guarded by a rampart, and without that, at some little distance, with a ditch. The prospect is large, more especially eastward. (Stukeley)

Stuckley's description would place this 'camp' somewhere near NZ285418 between the River Wear and the Old Durham Beck. This is now a flood plain with no evidence of earthworks. His description is that of Maiden Castle at NZ283417 on the other side of the River Wear. Hutchinson and the VCH appear to believe Stukely's description contained errors. Hutchinson (writing in the late C18) is markedly critical of Cade's 1785 illustration writing "This supposed vallum is at present so much levelled, that if ever it was forced, it now appears no otherwise than the swift slope of the bank on the side of the brook, and the mount is only a natural swell or rotundity of the back ground. The plot of ground chosen by the gentleman for the station or camp, on the north-west side nearest to old Durham, and where the brook doth not run, shews some deeps trenches and high earth fences; but the whole is so irregular, that it is not possible to derive any distinct figure from the remains of the works." Quite what happens here is unclear. Did Stukeley mix east and west, as suggested by the VCH, in which case what did he mean by 'incompassed too by a rivulet', something not applicably to the Maiden Castle fort. It does seem Cade's illustration is far from reliable but were Hutchinson's 'deep trenches and high earth fences' something other than old river courses?
Earlier versions of the Gatehouse database accepted Jackson and recorded this as a lost motte and bailey. After study of the sources the site is now (March 2012) rejected.
Links to archaeological and architectural databases, mapping and other online resources

Data >
Maps >
Streetmap   NLS maps   Where's the path   Old-Maps      
Data/Maps > 
Magic   V. O. B.   Geology   LiDAR   Open Domesday  
Air Photos > 
Bing Maps   Google Maps   Getmapping   ZoomEarth      
Photos >
CastleFacts   Geograph   Flickr   Panoramio      

Sources of information, references and further reading
Most of the sites or buildings recorded in this web site are NOT open to the public and permission to visit a site must always be sought from the landowner or tenant.
It is an offence to disturb a Scheduled Monument without consent. It is a destruction of everyone's heritage to remove archaeological evidence from ANY site without proper recording and reporting.
Don't use metal detectors on historic sites without authorisation.
The information on this web page may be derived from information compiled by and/or copyright of Historic England, County Historic Environment Records and other individuals and organisations. It may also contain information licensed under the Open Government Licence. All the sources given should be consulted to identify the original copyright holder and permission obtained from them before use of the information on this site for commercial purposes.
The author and compiler of Gatehouse does not receive any income from the site and funds it himself. The information within this site is provided freely for educational purposes only.
The bibliography owes much to various bibliographies produced by John Kenyon for the Council for British Archaeology, the Castle Studies Group and others.
Suggestions for finding online and/or hard copies of bibliographical sources can be seen at this link.
Minor archaeological investigations, such as watching brief reports, and some other 'grey' literature is most likely to be held by H.E.R.s but is often poorly referenced and is unlikely to be recorded here, or elsewhere, but some suggestions can be found here.
The possible site or monument is represented on maps as a point location. This is a guide only. It should be noted that OS grid references defines an area, not a point location. In practice this means the actual center of the site or monument may often, but not always, be to the North East of the point shown. Locations derived from OS grid references and from latitude longitiude may differ by a small distance.
Further information on mapping and location can be seen at this link.
Please help to make this as useful a resource as possible by contacting Gatehouse if you see errors, can add information or have suggestions for improvements in functality and design.
Help is acknowledged.
This record last updated 26/07/2017 09:20:08

Home | Books | Links | Fortifications and Castles | Other Information | Help | Downloads | Author Information | Contact