The comprehensive gazetteer and bibliography of the medieval castles, fortifications and palaces of England, Wales, the Islands.
The listings
Other Info
Print Page 
Next Record 
Previous Record 
Back to list 

Eddisbury Town Defences

In the civil parish of Delamere.
In the historic county of Cheshire.
Modern Authority of Cheshire.
1974 county of Cheshire.
Medieval County of Cheshire.

OS Map Grid Reference: SJ55326933
Latitude 53.21855° Longitude -2.66903°

Eddisbury Town Defences has been described as a probable Urban Defence, and also as a probable Fortified Manor House.

There are earthwork remains.

This site is a scheduled monument protected by law.


The excavation of Castle Ditch, Eddisbury, was carried out under Varley from 1936 to 1938. Four areas were excavated and a number of sections cut through the defences which suggested the following constructional sequence:
Phase 1: The erection of pre-rampart palisade defences, probably pre 250 BC.
Phase 2: The construction of the original univallate hill-fort around the eastern half of the hill, about 200-100 BC.
Phase 3: The reconstruction of the hill fort by an extension westwards and transforming Eddisbury Hill into a bivallate contour work, AD 1-50.
Phase 4: The complete destruction of the hill fort by the Romans in the late 1st century AD.
Phase 5: The re-occupation as an open site in the Dark Ages, 4-6th century AD.
Phase 6: a. The first Saxon occupation of the site attested by a hut dated 6th-8th century AD.
b. The re-erection of the defences in the 10th century AD which is possibly the AD 914 burh of Aetheflaeda.
Phase 7: The mediaeval and modern occupation. (See SJ 56 NE 2) (Varley 1950).
Forde-Johnston reinterprets the constructional sequence (Johnston 1962).
An Iron Age bivallate contour hillfort on Eddisbury Hill measures, overall, 380.0m NW-SE by 200.0m transversely. On the NE side, where best preserved, the inner rampart is 15.0m in width, 0.6m high internally, 4.0m externally and the inner ditch, 10.0m wide, 0.5m deep. The outer rampart is 16.0m in width, 2.0m high internally, 5.5m externally. There is no outer ditch. Either side of an inturned entrance at the NW end of the work and along the SW side, the defences have been reduced by ploughing and other agricultural activities, to little more than steep-faced scarps but also incorporate natural steep slopes of outcrop sandstone, particularly on the S and E. There is a small, probably original entrance at the SE end, cut through the natural sandstone outcrop. The former NW side of the fort, before extension westwards, is bounded by a normal field hedge bank, but there are no traces of the original earthworks here.
Published 1:2500 survey, 1970, correct (Ordnance Survey Field Investigation ASP 12-MAR-76).
(SJ 5534 6933) In 1987 the RCHME carried out a Level 3 analytical earthwork survey of Castle Ditch, Eddisbury hillfort and Burh. The monument is essentially as previously described, but the field evidence does not support Varley's claims that the first hillfort was univallate and confined to the eastern part of the hill and was later expanded and strengthened. The ramparts have been more extensively damaged by quarrying than previously recognised. Evidence for the rebuilding of the N defences was observed in the earthworks in a marked steepening of the rampart near its top. This relates closely to the evidence recorded by Varley for the rebuilding of this site as part of the Aethelfleadan occupation of Eddisbury. The site was surveyed by the RCHME at 1:1000 scale; plans and supporting text are available from the NMR archive (RCHME Field Investigation WRWN 26-FEB-87).
SJ 552 694. Eddisbury. Listed in gazetteer as a multivallate hillfort covering 3.1ha (Hogg 1979).
SJ 5534 6933. Eddisbury hillfort, Delamere, E of Old Pale Farm. Scheduled RSM No 25692. The fort is of a type familiar on the Welsh side of the Marches but unusual in Cheshire. It has additional value as an example of reoccupation after the departure of the Roman army and as such is rare indeed (Scheduling Report).
Publication of the RCHME survey, with additional documentary research. The absence of material from the excavations means that it is impossible to confirm Varley's assertion of reoccupation in the Roman and post-Roman period. Eddisbury is documented as a burh in 914 but was never a mint, and may have been replaced as a burh by Runcorn which was built in 915. Furtehrmore it is difficult to support Varley's conclusion that there was originally a small fort which was later enlarged, and that the southern defences were continuous. on the line he suggested (Cocroft 1989).
In May 2000, English Heritage carried out a desk-top assessment and Level 1 field survey of Old Pale Farm; Castle Ditch falls partly within the bounds of this area. The monument remains as described by RCHME Investigation 1987. Hogg's estimate of the area is probably c.0.5ha too little considering the damage done by quarrying recorded by Source 9. The quarries which impinge on the northern side of the hillfort (possibly the source of building stone for Vale Royal Abbey) and probable medieval field boundaries at its south-eastern end were allocated new NMR numbers to enhance the record. An excellent large scale plan of the monument is included on the OS 2-inch surveyor's draft of 1839. The EH survey suggests that the prehistoric field system alleged to exist on the northern side of the hill, detected by NJ Higham on his 1987 aerial photographs, can probably be dismissed as being either geological or post-medieval in origin. (PastScape)

Creighton and Higham write 'no significant above ground remains of former medieval town defences or gates at …Eddisbury' Presumable this is the C10 burghal fort built with an Iron Age hill fort, which is Bond's list of 'New Anglo-Saxon burghal forts of no later urban significance'.

In 914 AD Eddisbury is documented as a Saxon burh, although it was probably only short-lived since there was no mint there. However, the hillfort has considerable above ground remains and Creighton and Higham may be referring to something else though it is unclear as to what.
The assumption may have being made that the Burh documented in 914 was a communal defence. Gatehouse is not certain that all burhs recorded in the ASC were intended as communal sites. Some may have been fortified private lordly sites and this may have been the case here. The site was reused as a royal hunting lodge (see The Chamber in the Forest) showing the Iron Age fort was suitable for such use. However, some of the burhs may have been built as pure military camps with no significant communal or lordly residence and the pre-existing Iron Age earthworks would have made this site particularly suitable for such a function.
Links to archaeological and architectural databases, mapping and other online resources

Data >
PastScape   County HER   Scheduling        
Maps >
Streetmap   NLS maps   Where's the path   Old-Maps      
Data/Maps > 
Magic   V. O. B.   Geology   LiDAR   Open Domesday  
Air Photos > 
Bing Maps   Google Maps   Getmapping   ZoomEarth      
Photos >
CastleFacts   Geograph   Flickr   Panoramio      

Sources of information, references and further reading
Most of the sites or buildings recorded in this web site are NOT open to the public and permission to visit a site must always be sought from the landowner or tenant.
It is an offence to disturb a Scheduled Monument without consent. It is a destruction of everyone's heritage to remove archaeological evidence from ANY site without proper recording and reporting.
Don't use metal detectors on historic sites without authorisation.
The information on this web page may be derived from information compiled by and/or copyright of Historic England, County Historic Environment Records and other individuals and organisations. It may also contain information licensed under the Open Government Licence. All the sources given should be consulted to identify the original copyright holder and permission obtained from them before use of the information on this site for commercial purposes.
The author and compiler of Gatehouse does not receive any income from the site and funds it himself. The information within this site is provided freely for educational purposes only.
The bibliography owes much to various bibliographies produced by John Kenyon for the Council for British Archaeology, the Castle Studies Group and others.
Suggestions for finding online and/or hard copies of bibliographical sources can be seen at this link.
Minor archaeological investigations, such as watching brief reports, and some other 'grey' literature is most likely to be held by H.E.R.s but is often poorly referenced and is unlikely to be recorded here, or elsewhere, but some suggestions can be found here.
The possible site or monument is represented on maps as a point location. This is a guide only. It should be noted that OS grid references defines an area, not a point location. In practice this means the actual center of the site or monument may often, but not always, be to the North East of the point shown. Locations derived from OS grid references and from latitude longitiude may differ by a small distance.
Further information on mapping and location can be seen at this link.
Please help to make this as useful a resource as possible by contacting Gatehouse if you see errors, can add information or have suggestions for improvements in functality and design.
Help is acknowledged.
This record last updated 15/08/2017 15:56:53

Home | Books | Links | Fortifications and Castles | Other Information | Help | Downloads | Author Information | Contact