The comprehensive gazetteer and bibliography of the medieval castles, fortifications and palaces of England, Wales, the Islands.
The listings
Other Info
Print Page 
Next Record 
Previous Record 
Back to list 

Casten Dyke South

In the civil parish of Kilburn High and Low.
In the historic county of Yorkshire.
Modern Authority of North Yorkshire.
1974 county of North Yorkshire.
Medieval County of Yorkshire North Riding.

OS Map Grid Reference: SE51838163
Latitude 54.22782° Longitude -1.20639°

Casten Dyke South has been described as a probable Linear Defence or Dyke.

There are earthwork remains.

This site is a scheduled monument protected by law.


A linear boundary earthwork, which has widely been accepted as being a prehistoric dyke, associated with Casten Dyke North (UID 57368), the Cleave Dyke (UID 1032865), and the early Iron Age promontory fort at Roulston Scar (UID 57324), has been reinterpretated as being of medieval date. The boundary runs in a straight line from W to E. Over a distance of 260m at its W end, it survives in reasonable condition as an earthwork (Scheduled). The W terminus is the side of a steep-sided valley, Boar's Gill; a post medieval limestone quarry (UID 1526097) located here has potentially destroyed elements of the monument. The E end of the monument, which has been ploughed away but is clearly visible on early aerial photographs, extended for a further c200m to the head of another ravine, Hell Hole. The last few metres of the ditch may survive, although is is difficult to distinguish the artificial earthwork from erosion. The boundary would thus have cut off a block of landscape to the S, the southern edge of which is defined by the S escarpment of the Hambleton Hills. However, it seems likely on the evidence of both the form and plan relationship of Casten Dyke South that it is a later addition, probably of medieval date. The linear earthwork was reused as a field boundary into the 20th century. This feature ws mapped as part of the North York Moors National Park NMP, visible as earthworks on air photographs. The monument appears to be largely extant on the latest 2009 vertical photography. (PastScape)

There can be little doubt that the form of Casten Dyke South shows that its purpose was to enclose the land to the south, a promontory of c.23 hectares, by running between two steep- sided natural valleys, Boar's Gill and Hell Hole. This may have been done for agricultural purposes in either the late medieval or early post-medieval periods. Nevertheless, it remains a distinct possibility that the dyke was either created specifically for the Battle of Byland, or that it was an earlier, prehistoric, boundary which was re-used during the battle. By sealing off the south side of the plateau, and with very steep slopes on all other sides, any English force encamped within would have felt they held a reasonably secure position, particularly if they were augmented by another force close by to the west which had modified the northern rampart of Rouslton Scar. The plateau also overlooks Boar's Gill and Hell Hole, both of which would have provided routes up the natural escarpment for the Scottish army seeking to outflank the English. It is less easy to make a case for Casten Dyke North having been created specifically for the battle, although the anomalies apparent at the north-east end close to Flassen Gill are interesting. If either of the dykes were created or partly used during the battle, then this would force a re-assessment of the battle itself; the traditional narrative suggests that the battle was a hastily organised action, but the creation and use of defensive earthworks would indicate that it involved a certain amount of preparation on both sides. (Richardson and Dennison 2016)

The Battle of Byland was a relatively small battle of 1322, between a few thousand Scots and several hundred English. Fundamentally it was a delaying action by the English to allow Edward II to escape from an unexpected Scottish force. The use of earthwork defences for the English force is entirely sensible. The question is how much time the English Force had to dig defences or if they were just reusing a pre-existing earthwork.
Links to archaeological and architectural databases, mapping and other online resources

Data >
PastScape       Scheduling        
Maps >
Streetmap   NLS maps   Where's the path   Old-Maps      
Data/Maps > 
Magic   V. O. B.   Geology   LiDAR   Open Domesday  
Air Photos > 
Bing Maps   Google Maps   Getmapping   ZoomEarth      
Photos >
CastleFacts   Geograph   Flickr   Panoramio      

Sources of information, references and further reading
Most of the sites or buildings recorded in this web site are NOT open to the public and permission to visit a site must always be sought from the landowner or tenant.
It is an offence to disturb a Scheduled Monument without consent. It is a destruction of everyone's heritage to remove archaeological evidence from ANY site without proper recording and reporting.
Don't use metal detectors on historic sites without authorisation.
The information on this web page may be derived from information compiled by and/or copyright of Historic England, County Historic Environment Records and other individuals and organisations. It may also contain information licensed under the Open Government Licence. All the sources given should be consulted to identify the original copyright holder and permission obtained from them before use of the information on this site for commercial purposes.
The author and compiler of Gatehouse does not receive any income from the site and funds it himself. The information within this site is provided freely for educational purposes only.
The bibliography owes much to various bibliographies produced by John Kenyon for the Council for British Archaeology, the Castle Studies Group and others.
Suggestions for finding online and/or hard copies of bibliographical sources can be seen at this link.
Minor archaeological investigations, such as watching brief reports, and some other 'grey' literature is most likely to be held by H.E.R.s but is often poorly referenced and is unlikely to be recorded here, or elsewhere, but some suggestions can be found here.
The possible site or monument is represented on maps as a point location. This is a guide only. It should be noted that OS grid references defines an area, not a point location. In practice this means the actual center of the site or monument may often, but not always, be to the North East of the point shown. Locations derived from OS grid references and from latitude longitiude may differ by a small distance.
Further information on mapping and location can be seen at this link.
Please help to make this as useful a resource as possible by contacting Gatehouse if you see errors, can add information or have suggestions for improvements in functality and design.
Help is acknowledged.
This record last updated 27/08/2017 07:00:39

Home | Books | Links | Fortifications and Castles | Other Information | Help | Downloads | Author Information | Contact